SPLIT book III offtopic

Saying has been use in the past for political gain oh wow.

If you speak about teagan case. Well I prefer having teagan in council then any otther because he never speak or argue if that has a move for political gain. Well I am a lousy politician, trying to remove someone that is not a treat to put someone that can be a treat.

And defamation laws stay it's in advancement should I remind the case of Dani_ddd insulting every person in council, should i remind the time when UWS keep saying everyone else is corrupt with out proof and reporting false thing about other party like patron decide of eradiction of player in game??? There is no way I will allow that kind of politic to be back ...

For the rest what, you are afraid your list cannot have enough people of Somerset ready to give time to help him be elected that you absolute need outsider help? Is that what you said?

Why I said other are for it is because last election leader of CUE said he will not help michaellb because that is somerset thing. And why I said patron agree well, I never see much outside patron coming in Somerset hall during election and lord_justinan post that he like this laws soon after I post it. He is patron. And SNP easy to understand we are for it, if one member proposes it.

The fact remains if that kind of laws don’t exist the last election proof it. And we will have a huge mess once again, because this time I am sure outsider Patron/EC and CUE and SNP outsider friend will come to tell thing about UWS since UWS like to talk in back and make false accusation especially in bath and should I remind the leader of UWS treat this entire council and nearly cause a war? That the regent has come to tell her to go home. When is at that point I prefer to keep them out, and we will just fight between somerset people at least that make less collateral damage.

And for censors bias, they are nominate by the game admin if not happy complain there. If your complain gets not listen there is two option either the admin are bias (then nothing you can do) or thing are not bias (what is the case) especially that ban pass by LJS. Saying they are bias is saying LJS is bias. This people just need to respect the forum rules and they will have no trouble that it’s respect the rules of the game.

Your entire statement is incorrect and false accusations.

This obsessive bias you have against UWs is affecting your judgement and you are no longer able to be fair and objective.

I believe the members of UWS have grounds for prosecution based on the defamation laws.

I wasn't referring to Teagan. I am sure you like councilors who are invisible and never speak unless they speak your words.
I deliberately stayed out of that mess in the forum but read everything and nothing was said by those banned (all of one party)that was any worse then the things said by you and others(of another party)

There is bias and you know it and you have even alluded to it here in your posts. Anyone who is objective and fair-minded can see it.

as to the mess of the last debate that had nothing to do with UWS. That was all Sajan.

Wiseman said: To have a quarell you need at least two person

Allie is right, that mess in the Debate was caused by Sajanzv and an over zealous Moderator

The moderator was well within her rights and acted accordingly.

The unwarranted interference of the censors escalated the situation.

Do you want to see what is a zealous moderator

Censors only do their job that it! not happy their is way to complain if that don'T work that means admin of the game read here someone that have part of ownership fo the game consider that it's normal and should act this way.

End of discussion you don't argue with owner of a private server and of a game. You comply with is rules ...

I did present my objection to him, in french, and he did involve himself in the situation and took control of it.

Quote :

We have, as a County, recently consummated a trade with a DD Trade Minister, using a grant jointly created by a CUS sheriff and an SNP Trade Minister, with a UWS trader delivering the "physical" goods. None of those people asked what party others may have belonged to. That's the spirit in which we need to work here. Last election was a debacle, the debate a fiasco and IT'S OVER! Who caused it, whether the censors were heavy handed, all of it is immaterial to getting on with the county's business.

What CUS sheriff do you refer to? I am not and Tekin is not UWS.

I have always worked together with my fellow council members or tried to when they were willing despite party lines. I do not judge a person by the party they belong to but by their action, demeanor, and their posts.
If party lines don't matter and the mess of the last election is over then why are there revisions to the laws being made specifically aimed against one party and admited to that effect by the one who proposed them? Why does the count rant and rile against one party and it's members in this same public thread?

It obviously is not over to some people.

what tekkin have to do with the trade of wiltshire alli?

tekin carried the iron to WC.

Allikath wrote:

We do not need a power hungry noobie wanna-be lecturing us on the responsibilities of our office.
Learn them first.

I take exception to these remarks, Allikath. I have not in anyway attacked you, nor defamed you. I couldn't care less about "power" - it's a frickin game. Sorry if I got your party wrong - I don't pay THAT much attention. My point was that working together is productive, and that i ignore such matters.

I expect an apology for this slanderous attack.

That the job of the Lt of Gloucester that means Turlogh

But I add the guy

Turlough is gone for two months.
Bellos was notified but he disappeared too.

Something needs to be done. There is another waiting to get in.

What needs to be done, Allikath, is for you to offer me the apology which I am still waiting for.

I apologize.

Thank you, Allikath. I accept the apology.